There are arguments within Christianity in favor of dating and opposed
to the practice of dating. Some of the arguments that oppose the practice of
dating revolve around the idea that dating is competitive. Those who believe
this want to return to a "more formal system of dating" that's
purpose to "identify a good marriage partner" and places "strict
limitations on sexual intimacy." I don't agree with the 'anti-daters' who
argue that dating in our current social context is "essentially practice
for divorce." The arguments in favor of dating contest the 'anti-daters'
theories; these arguments revolve around learning from people that one dates,
preparing one to care for another on a deeper level, and providing the grounds
for "personal transformation." I agree with the 'pro-daters' theories
because they are more realistic. If one doesn't date, how is one supposed to
find out the type of person one is looking to have as a future life partner?
What would happen if one got married to someone one later found out that had
nothing in common with one? I believe it is important, especially as one
matures, for one to be able to decide what qualities and characteristics one
believes will make a suitable partner to fit where one wants to go in life,
individually and collectively. Also, when one dates, one learns how to care for
someone on a different level than one cares of oneself or one's family; it is a
life skill that is needed in order to make connections. Through the
arguments/disagreements/hard times during dating relationships, one will learn
how to handle oneself and difficult situations, another life skill. Most
prevalently, one can learn about oneself in a new way. When one dates, one
discovers latent ideas possessed by oneself that were not apparent till needed
and other things about oneself. Dating shapes a person's perception.
This argument compares with the experience of my peers and
'contemporaries' in an interesting way. The "dating period [can be
divided] into three eras: high school, college, and emerging adulthood."
In high school, people tend to be influenced by their friends, the expectations
of society, and the expectations of their parents. In college, people have more
freedom to experience dating in their own way, but it becomes more confusing
and leads to conversations about serious commitment. The period of emerging
adulthood is the most complicated because it involves deciding what one is
going to do the rest of one's life and who, if anyone, one wants to spend that
time. Generally, I feel that my generation is pro-dating because people like to
get to know another person, especially if there is a possibility of a romantic
relationship ensuing. People I know have learned qualities that they do and
don't like in other people by dating; they have also learned more about
themselves in the process and to what length they believe romantic
relationships should play in their lives.
The article "Conflict Over Hook-Up Culture" from Busted Halo
described the 'hook-up' culture prevalent in colleges and universities. The
article compares to the earlier described arguments by showing how dating has
changed over the years, including how it is seen by some groups of people. A
'hook-up' can be described as six or more different things, ranging from
kissing to sexual intercourse. Any type of hooking-up first can lead to a
'awkward' situations, starting relationships off on the wrong foot, or horrible
acts such as date rape. Since most people believe a 'hook-up' should be
meaningful, the after effects can be devastating or great, depending on the
outcome; this is especially true for women because men tend to participate in
the act for just pure pleasure. The media and rumors inflate the ‘hook-up’
culture, but in actuality, not everyone is doing it; one should follow
one's own path - morals and values - and participate in what one is
comfortable. As seen throughout time, if one doesn't like something, take
action to change what one wishes to see in the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment